跳转至内容
Merck
CN
  • Systematic review of the nutritional supplements dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Systematic review of the nutritional supplements dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage (2008-04-18)
S Brien, P Prescott, N Bashir, H Lewith, G Lewith
摘要

Conventional treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is associated with serious gastrointestinal side effects and in view of the recent withdrawal of some cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, identifying safer alternative treatment options is needed. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the existing evidence from randomised controlled trials of two chemically related nutritional supplements, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) in the treatment of OA to determine their efficacy and safety profile. The electronic databases [Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Amed, Cinahl and NeLH (1950 to November 2007)] were searched. The search strategy combined terms: osteoarthritis, degenerative joint disorder, dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO, methylsulfonylmethane, MSM, clinical trial; double-blind, single blind, RCT, placebo, randomized, comparative study, evaluation study, control. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Data were extracted and quality was assessed using the JADAD scale. Six studies were included [evaluating a total of 681 patients with OA of the knee for DMSO (N=297 on active treatment); 168 patients for MSM (N=52 on active treatment)]. Two of the four DMSO trials, and both MSM trials reported significant improvement in pain outcomes in the treatment group compared to comparator treatments, however, methodological issues and concerns over optimal dosage and treatment period, were highlighted. No definitive conclusion can currently be drawn for either supplement. The findings from all the DMSO studies need to be viewed with caution because of poor methodology including; possible unblinding, and questionable treatment duration and dose. The data from the more rigorous MSM trials provide positive but not definitive evidence that MSM is superior to placebo in the treatment of mild to moderate OA of the knee. Further studies are now required to identify both the optimum dosage and longer-term safety of MSM and DMSO, and definitive efficacy trials.

材料
货号
品牌
产品描述

Sigma-Aldrich
二甲基亚砜, Hybri-Max, sterile-filtered, BioReagent, suitable for hybridoma, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
二甲基亚砜, ACS reagent, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
二甲基亚砜, for molecular biology
Sigma-Aldrich
二甲基亚砜, suitable for HPLC, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
二甲基亚砜, sterile-filtered, BioPerformance Certified, meets EP, USP testing specifications, suitable for hybridoma
Sigma-Aldrich
二甲基亚砜, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
二甲基亚砜, anhydrous, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
二甲基亚砜, ≥99.5% (GC), suitable for plant cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
二甲基亚砜, puriss. p.a., ACS reagent, ≥99.9% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
二甲基亚砜, BioUltra, for molecular biology, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
二甲基亚砜, puriss. p.a., dried, ≤0.02% water
Sigma-Aldrich
二甲基砜, 98%
Sigma-Aldrich
二甲基亚砜, PCR Reagent
Sigma-Aldrich
二甲基亚砜, meets EP testing specifications, meets USP testing specifications
Supelco
二甲基砜, Standard for quantitative NMR, TraceCERT®, Manufactured by: Sigma-Aldrich Production GmbH, Switzerland
Supelco
二甲基亚砜, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Supelco
二甲基亚砜, analytical standard
Supelco
二甲基砜, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Supelco
二甲基亚砜, for inorganic trace analysis, ≥99.99995% (metals basis)
Sigma-Aldrich
二甲基亚砜, Vetec, reagent grade, 99%
二甲基亚砜, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard