跳转至内容
Merck
CN
  • Different methods of detaching adherent cells significantly affect the detection of TRAIL receptors.

Different methods of detaching adherent cells significantly affect the detection of TRAIL receptors.

Tumori (2013-02-08)
Bo Zhang, Hong Shan, Dan Li, Zheng-ran Li, Kang-shun Zhu, Zai-bo Jiang, Ming-sheng Huang
摘要

As a powerful technique allowing analysis of large numbers of cells, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) is used more and more widely. For FACS analysis, adherent cells are usually detached by trypsinization, followed by centrifugation and resuspension. However, trypsinization can cut off some receptors from the cell surface like fine scissors, which will affect the accuracy of FACS results. Though non-enzymatic methods such as citric saline buffer have been used to determine cell surface receptors, how much of the receptors is cut off by trypsinization has been rarely studied. This work aimed to investigate whether different methods of detaching adherent cells could affect the detection of cell surface receptors. Human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines (HepG2, Huh7 and Hep3B) were detached enzymatically with trypsin-EDTA solution or non-enzymatically with citric saline buffer, and then the receptors of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) were detected by FACS analysis. Cell viability, cell cycle and apoptosis (sub-G1 fraction detected by FACS) of the trypsin-EDTA group and citric saline buffer group were also studied. Different methods of detaching adherent cells could significantly affect the detection of TRAIL receptors. Compared to the conventional trypsin-EDTA group, the non-enzymatic group showed a 3.42-fold increase in the mean fluorescence intensity index of DcR HepG2 and a 1.25-fold increase in DR Huh 7 (P <0.05). However, the viability, cell cycle and apoptosis of these cells were not affected. Citric saline buffer might be recommended as the first choice to detach adherent cells for FACS analysis of cell surface receptors.

材料
货号
品牌
产品描述

Sigma-Aldrich
胰蛋白酶 来源于猪胰腺, lyophilized powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, 1,000-2,000 BAEE units/mg solid
Sigma-Aldrich
胰蛋白酶 来源于牛胰腺, TPCK Treated, essentially salt-free, lyophilized powder, ≥10,000 BAEE units/mg protein
Sigma-Aldrich
胰蛋白酶 来源于猪胰腺, Type IX-S, lyophilized powder, 13,000-20,000 BAEE units/mg protein
Sigma-Aldrich
胰蛋白酶 来源于牛胰腺, Type I, ~10,000 BAEE units/mg protein
Sigma-Aldrich
胰蛋白酶 来源于牛胰腺, powder, ≥7,500 BAEE units/mg solid
Sigma-Aldrich
胰蛋白酶 来源于牛胰腺, suitable for protein sequencing, lyophilized powder
Sigma-Aldrich
胰蛋白酶 来源于猪胰腺, lyophilized powder, Type II-S, 1,000-2,000 units/mg dry solid
Sigma-Aldrich
胰蛋白酶 来源于牛胰腺, TPCK Treated, essentially salt-free, lyophilized powder, ≥10,000 BAEE units/mg protein
Sigma-Aldrich
TrypZean® 牛, recombinant, expressed in corn, lyophilized powder, ≥3,350 units/mg solid (USP)
Sigma-Aldrich
胰蛋白酶 来源于牛胰腺, Type XI, lyophilized powder, ≥6,000 BAEE units/mg protein
Sigma-Aldrich
胰蛋白酶 来源于牛胰腺, essentially salt-free, lyophilized powder, ≥9,000 BAEE units/mg protein, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
乙酰化胰蛋白酶 来源于牛胰腺, Type V-S, ≥8,500 BAEE units/mg protein (biuret)
Sigma-Aldrich
胰蛋白酶 来源于猪胰腺, lyophilized powder, γ-irradiated, BioXtra, suitable for cell culture, 1,000-2,000 BAEE units/mg solid
Sigma-Aldrich
胰蛋白酶 来源于牛胰腺, ≥2,500 USP units/mg solid, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
胰蛋白酶 来源于猪胰腺, tablet, 1 mg tablet
Sigma-Aldrich
胰蛋白酶 来源于人类胰腺, salt-free, lyophilized powder, vial of ≥1,000 BAEE units
Sigma-Aldrich
胰蛋白酶 来源于猪胰腺, ~1500 U/mg