Skip to Content
Merck
CN
  • Non-animal photosafety screening for complex cosmetic ingredients with photochemical and photobiochemical assessment tools.

Non-animal photosafety screening for complex cosmetic ingredients with photochemical and photobiochemical assessment tools.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP (2015-06-07)
Hayato Nishida, Morihiko Hirota, Yoshiki Seto, Gen Suzuki, Masashi Kato, Masato Kitagaki, Mariko Sugiyama, Hirokazu Kouzuki, Satomi Onoue
ABSTRACT

Previously, a non-animal screening approach was proposed for evaluating photosafety of cosmetic ingredients by means of in vitro photochemical and photobiochemical assays; however, complex cosmetic ingredients, such as plant extracts and polymers, could not be evaluated because their molecular weight is often poorly defined and so their molar concentration cannot be calculated. The aim of the present investigation was to establish a photosafety screen for complex cosmetic ingredients by using appropriately modified in vitro photosafety assays. Twenty plant extracts were selected as model materials on the basis of photosafety information, and their phototoxic potentials were assessed by means of ultraviolet (UV)/visible light (VIS) spectral analysis, reactive oxygen species (ROS)/micellar ROS (mROS) assays, and 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity testing (3T3 NRU PT). The maximum UV/VIS absorption value was employed as a judgment factor for evaluating photoexcitability of samples, and the value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion for photosafety identification. The ROS/mROS assays were conducted at 50 μg/mL, and no false negative prediction was obtained. Furthermore, the ROS/mROS assays at 50 μg/mL had a similar predictive capacity to the ROS/mROS assays in the previous study. A systematic tiered approach for simple and rapid non-animal photosafety evaluation of complex cosmetic ingredients can be constructed using these modified in vitro photochemical assays.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Sulfanilamide, Vetec, reagent grade, 97%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl anthranilate, natural, ≥98%, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ascorbic acid, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid-12C2, 99.9 atom % 12C
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ascorbic acid, reagent grade, crystalline
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ascorbic acid, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Indomethacin, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ascorbic acid, reagent grade
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ascorbic acid, suitable for cell culture, suitable for plant cell culture, ≥98%
Supelco
Ethanol standards 10% (v/v), 10 % (v/v) in H2O, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethanol Fixative 80% v/v, suitable for fixing solution (blood films)
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium dodecanoate, 99-100%
Sigma-Aldrich
Nitrotetrazolium Blue chloride, powder, electrophoresis grade
Sigma-Aldrich
Nitrotetrazolium Blue chloride, ≥90.0% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Sulfanilamide, ≥98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Fenofibrate, ≥99%, powder
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ascorbic acid, puriss. p.a., ACS reagent, reag. ISO, Ph. Eur., 99.7-100.5% (oxidimetric)
Sigma-Aldrich
Isopropyl alcohol, ≥99.7%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Propylene glycol, ≥99.5% (GC), FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ascorbic acid, 99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, for luminescence, BioUltra, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
1-Hexadecanol, ReagentPlus®, 99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl anthranilate, ≥97%, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
5-Methoxypsoralen, 99%
Sigma-Aldrich
(±)-1,3-Butanediol, anhydrous, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Ascorbic acid, BioUltra, ≥99.5% (RT)
Sigma-Aldrich
1-Hexadecanol, 95%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, natural, ≥99.5%, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
(±)-1,3-Butanediol, ReagentPlus®, 99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, ≥99.5%, FCC, FG