Skip to Content
Merck
CN
  • Comparative transcriptomic approach to investigate differences in wine yeast physiology and metabolism during fermentation.

Comparative transcriptomic approach to investigate differences in wine yeast physiology and metabolism during fermentation.

Applied and environmental microbiology (2009-08-25)
Debra Rossouw, Roberto Olivares-Hernandes, Jens Nielsen, Florian F Bauer
ABSTRACT

Commercial wine yeast strains of the species Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been selected to satisfy many different, and sometimes highly specific, oenological requirements. As a consequence, more than 200 different strains with significantly diverging phenotypic traits are produced globally. This genetic resource has been rather neglected by the scientific community because industrial strains are less easily manipulated than the limited number of laboratory strains that have been successfully employed to investigate fundamental aspects of cellular biology. However, laboratory strains are unsuitable for the study of many phenotypes that are of significant scientific and industrial interest. Here, we investigate whether a comparative transcriptomics and phenomics approach, based on the analysis of five phenotypically diverging industrial wine yeast strains, can provide insights into the molecular networks that are responsible for the expression of such phenotypes. For this purpose, some oenologically relevant phenotypes, including resistance to various stresses, cell wall properties, and metabolite production of these strains were evaluated and aligned with transcriptomic data collected during alcoholic fermentation. The data reveal significant differences in gene regulation between the five strains. While the genetic complexity underlying the various successive stress responses in a dynamic system such as wine fermentation reveals the limits of the approach, many of the relevant differences in gene expression can be linked to specific phenotypic differences between the strains. This is, in particular, the case for many aspects of metabolic regulation. The comparative approach therefore opens new possibilities to investigate complex phenotypic traits on a molecular level.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
D-(+)-Glucose, BioUltra, anhydrous, ≥99.5% (sum of enantiomers, HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
D-Glucose-12C6, 16O6, 99.9 atom % 16O, 99.9 atom % 12C
Sigma-Aldrich
D-(+)-Glucose, tested according to Ph. Eur.
Sigma-Aldrich
D-(+)-Glucose, ACS reagent
Sigma-Aldrich
D-(+)-Glucose, suitable for mouse embryo cell culture, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
D-(+)-Glucose, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
D-(+)-Glucose, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, suitable for insect cell culture, suitable for plant cell culture, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
D-(+)-Glucose, ≥99.5% (GC), BioXtra
Sigma-Aldrich
D-(+)-Glucose, Hybri-Max, powder, BioReagent, suitable for hybridoma
Millipore
Peptone special, suitable for microbiology
Millipore
Wheat Peptone, suitable for microbiology
Millipore
Proteose Peptone, Enzymatic hydrolysate
Millipore
Peptone from pea, suitable for microbiology
Supelco
D-(+)-Glucose, analytical standard
Millipore
Peptone from vegetable, suitable for microbiology
Sigma-Aldrich
L-(−)-Glucose, ≥99%
Supelco
Dextrose, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Millipore
Peptone from potatoes, suitable for microbiology
Millipore
Peptone (vegetable), No. 2, suitable for microbiology
Millipore
Peptone (vegetable), No. 1, suitable for microbiology
Millipore
Peptone, mycological, suitable for microbiology