All Photos(1)
About This Item
CAS Number:
FEMA Number:
2116
EC Number:
Council of Europe no.:
298n
MDL number:
UNSPSC Code:
12164502
NACRES:
NA.21
grade
Kosher
Quality Level
refractive index
n20/D 1.5690 (lit.)
density
1.161 g/mL at 25 °C (lit.)
application(s)
flavors and fragrances
Documentation
see Safety & Documentation for available documents
food allergen
no known allergens
Organoleptic
balsamic; woody; sweet; vanilla
Looking for similar products? Visit Product Comparison Guide
Related Categories
Biochem/physiol Actions
Taste at 10 ppm
Disclaimer
For R&D or non-EU Food use. Not for retail sale.
Signal Word
Warning
Hazard Statements
Hazard Classifications
Skin Irrit. 2
WGK
WGK 2
Flash Point(F)
Not applicable
Flash Point(C)
Not applicable
Personal Protective Equipment
dust mask type N95 (US), Eyeshields, Gloves
Regulatory Information
植物油/植物胶产品
Certificates of Analysis (COA)
Search for Certificates of Analysis (COA) by entering the products Lot/Batch Number. Lot and Batch Numbers can be found on a product’s label following the words ‘Lot’ or ‘Batch’.
Already Own This Product?
Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.
Petra Turić et al.
Collegium antropologicum, 35(1), 83-87 (2011-06-15)
Because of their widespread use, fragrances are among the most common causes of contact allergic dermatitis, second only to nickel. During a five-year period 3,065 patients with contact dermatitis were patch tested using a specific mix of fragrances. 509 (16.6%)
Catalina Matiz et al.
Pediatric dermatology, 28(4), 368-374 (2010-09-03)
Systemic contact dermatitis is an under-recognized skin reaction that occurs secondary to systemic (oral, intravenous, intramuscular, inhaled, or subcutaneous) exposure to a hapten in a previously sensitized individual. Medicaments are the most common cause of SCD in the adult population
M Necas et al.
Phlebology, 25(3), 132-137 (2010-05-21)
The aim of the study was to determine the frequency of contact sensitization in patients with lower extremity dermatitis. Between the years 2001 and 2007, the authors investigated 462 patients (mean age 49.1 years, 196 men and 266 women) with
J M Fernández-Vozmediano et al.
Actas dermo-sifiliograficas, 102(3), 206-211 (2011-02-22)
One of the greatest challenges in occupational dermatology is the identification of chemical substances used by patients in their work in order to determine their allergenic potential. Numerous techniques have been described for the identification of allergenic compounds. These tests
Eli Magen et al.
The American journal of the medical sciences, 341(3), 202-206 (2011-01-15)
Patch testing is performed to diagnose allergic contact dermatitis to avoid exposure to the revealed contact allergens. Nevertheless, patch testing is not routinely performed in the evaluation of patients with chronic idiopathic (spontaneous) urticaria (CIU). The objective of this study
Our team of scientists has experience in all areas of research including Life Science, Material Science, Chemical Synthesis, Chromatography, Analytical and many others.
Contact Technical Service