Skip to Content
Merck
CN
  • Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis: a phase II trial.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis: a phase II trial.

Neurology (2015-02-13)
Giovanni L Mancardi, Maria P Sormani, Francesca Gualandi, Albert Saiz, Eric Carreras, Elisa Merelli, Amedea Donelli, Alessandra Lugaresi, Paolo Di Bartolomeo, Maria R Rottoli, Alessandro Rambaldi, Maria P Amato, Luca Massacesi, Massimo Di Gioia, Luisa Vuolo, Daniela Currò, Luca Roccatagliata, Massimo Filippi, Umberto Aguglia, Pasquale Iacopino, Dominique Farge, Riccardo Saccardi
ABSTRACT

To assess in multiple sclerosis (MS) the effect of intense immunosuppression followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (AHSCT) vs mitoxantrone (MTX) on disease activity measured by MRI. We conducted a multicenter, phase II, randomized trial including patients with secondary progressive or relapsing-remitting MS, with a documented increase in the last year on the Expanded Disability Status Scale, in spite of conventional therapy, and presence of one or more gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) areas. Patients were randomized to receive intense immunosuppression (mobilization with cyclophosphamide and filgrastim, conditioning with carmustine, cytosine-arabinoside, etoposide, melphalan, and anti-thymocyte globulin) followed by AHSCT or MTX 20 mg every month for 6 months. The primary endpoint was the cumulative number of new T2 lesions in the 4 years following randomization. Secondary endpoints were the cumulative number of Gd+ lesions, relapse rate, and disability progression. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Twenty-one patients were randomized and 17 had postbaseline evaluable MRI scans. AHSCT reduced by 79% the number of new T2 lesions as compared to MTX (rate ratio 0.21, p = 0.00016). It also reduced Gd+ lesions as well as the annualized relapse rate. No difference was found in the progression of disability. Intense immunosuppression followed by AHSCT is significantly superior to MTX in reducing MRI activity in severe cases of MS. These results strongly support further phase III studies with primary clinical endpoints. The study was registered as EUDRACT No. 2007-000064-24.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Methotrexate for system suitability, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Methotrexate for peak identification, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Methotrexate, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
SAFC
Methotrexate
Sigma-Aldrich
Methotrexate, meets USP testing specifications
Supelco
Methotrexate, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material