Skip to Content

Dear Customer:

The current international situation is complex and volatile, and uncertain tariff policies may potentially impact our product prices. Given these uncertainties, we value your understanding regarding order-related matters.

If you decide to place an order during this period, we reserve the right to adjust the price based on the evolving situation. We understand that market changes may cause inconvenience. We will negotiate with you if there’s a significant price fluctuation due to tariff policy changes before the order’s actual delivery, and in such cases we may adjust or cancel the order as necessary.

We are planning system maintenance between Friday, Apr 18 at 9:00 PM CDT and Saturday, Apr 19 at 9:00 AM CDT. This will impact both web and offline transactions, including online orders, quotes, price and availability checks, and order status inquiries. We apologize for any inconvenience.

For important updates on recent policy changes, please click here for more details.

Merck
CN
  • Familial KANK1 deletion that does not follow expected imprinting pattern.

Familial KANK1 deletion that does not follow expected imprinting pattern.

European journal of medical genetics (2013-03-05)
Rena J Vanzo, Megan M Martin, Mallory R Sdano, Sarah T South
ABSTRACT

Deletion of the KANK1 gene (also called ANKRD15), located at chromosome position 9p24.3, has been associated with neurodevelopmental disease including congenital cerebral palsy, hypotonia, quadriplegia, and intellectual disability in a four-generation family. The inheritance pattern in this family was suggested to be maternal imprinting, as all affected individuals inherited the deletion from their fathers and monoallelic protein expression was observed. We present a family in which the proband's phenotype, including autism spectrum disorder, motor delay, and intellectual disability, is consistent with this previous report of KANK1 deletions. However, a paternally inherited deletion in the proband's unaffected sibling did not support maternal imprinting. This family raises consideration of further complexity of the KANK1 locus, including variable expressivity, incomplete penetrance, and the additive effects of additional genomic variants or the potential benign nature of inherited copy number variations (CNVs). However, when considered with the previous publication, our case also suggests that KANK1 may be subject to random monoallelic expression as a possible mode of inheritance. It is also important to consider that KANK1 has two alternately spliced transcripts, A and B. These have differential tissue expression and thus potentially differential clinical significance. Based upon cases in the literature, the present case, and information in the Database of Genomic Variants, it is possible that only aberrations of variant A contribute to neurodevelopmental disease. The familial deletion in this present case does not support maternal imprinting as an inheritance pattern. We suggest that other inheritance patterns and caveats should be considered when evaluating KANK1 deletions, which may become increasingly recognized through whole genome microarray testing, whole genome sequencing, and whole exome sequencing techniques.