Skip to Content
Merck
CN
  • Validation of a Metabolite Panel for a More Accurate Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Using Quantitative LC-MS/MS.

Validation of a Metabolite Panel for a More Accurate Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Using Quantitative LC-MS/MS.

Clinical chemistry (2019-01-17)
Tiffany A Freed, Josef Coresh, Lesley A Inker, Douglas R Toal, Regis Perichon, Jingsha Chen, Kelli D Goodman, Qibo Zhang, Jessie K Conner, Deirdre M Hauser, Kate E T Vroom, Maria L Oyaski, Jacob E Wulff, Gudný Eiríksdóttir, Vilmundur Gudnason, Vicente E Torres, Lisa A Ford, Andrew S Levey
ABSTRACT

Clinical practice guidelines recommend estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using validated equations based on serum creatinine (eGFRcr), cystatin C (eGFRcys), or both (eGFRcr-cys). However, when compared with the measured GFR (mGFR), only eGFRcr-cys meets recommended performance standards. Our goal was to develop a more accurate eGFR method using a panel of metabolites without creatinine, cystatin C, or demographic variables. An ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for acetylthreonine, phenylacetylglutamine, pseudouridine, and tryptophan was developed, and a 20-day, multiinstrument analytical validation was conducted. The assay was tested in 2424 participants with mGFR data from 4 independent research studies. A new GFR equation (eGFRmet) was developed in a random subset (n = 1615) and evaluated in the remaining participants (n = 809). Performance was assessed as the frequency of large errors [estimates that differed from mGFR by at least 30% (1 - P30); goal <10%]. The assay had a mean imprecision (≤10% intraassay, ≤6.9% interassay), linearity over the quantitative range (r2 > 0.98), and analyte recovery (98.5%-113%). There was no carryover, no interferences observed, and analyte stability was established. In addition, 1 - P30 in the validation set for eGFRmet (10.0%) was more accurate than eGFRcr (13.1%) and eGFRcys (12.0%) but not eGFRcr-cys (8.7%). Combining metabolites, creatinine, cystatin C, and demographics led to the most accurate equation (7.0%). Neither equation had substantial variation among population subgroups. The new eGFRmet equation could serve as a confirmatory test for GFR estimation.